1. Schwamm LH. Telehealth: seven strategies to successfully implement disruptive technology and transform health care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014;33(2):200-206. PMID:
24493761.
2. Akalu R, Rossos PG, Chan CT. The role of law and policy in tele-monitoring. J Telemed Telecare 2006;12(7):325-327. PMID:
17059647.
3. Brooks E, Turvey C, Augusterfer EF. Provider barriers to telemental health: obstacles overcome, obstacles remaining. Telemed J E Health 2013;19(6):433-437. PMID:
23590176.
4. Kim JE, Song YM, Park JH, Lee JR. Attitude of Korean primary care family physicians towards telehealth. Korean J Fam Med 2011;32(6):341-351. PMID:
22745872.
7. van Dyk L. A review of telehealth service implementation frameworks. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2014;11(2):1279-1298. PMID:
24464237.
8. Field MJ. Institute of Medicine. Telemedicine: a guide to assessing telecommunications for health care. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 1996.
9. Lustig TA. Institute of Medicine. The role of telehealth in an evolving health care environment: workshop summary. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2012.
11. Hebert M. Telehealth success: evaluation framework development. Stud Health Technol Inform 2001;84(Pt 2):1145-1149. PMID:
11604908.
12. Wootton R, Vladzymyrskyy A, Zolfo M, Bonnardot L. Experience with low-cost telemedicine in three different settings. Recommendations based on a proposed framework for network performance evaluation. Glob Health Action 2011 Dec 6 [Epub]. PMID:
10.3402/gha.v4i0.7214.
13. Chaula JA, Yngstrom L, Kowalski S. A framework for evaluation of information systems security Proceedings of the ISSA 2005 new knowledge today conference; 2005 Jun 29-Jul 1. Sandton, South Africa; p. 1-11.
14. Ammenwerth E, de Keizer N. An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care: trends in evaluation research 1982-2002. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004;107(Pt 2):1289-1294. PMID:
15361022.
15. Donabedian A. The evaluation of medical care programs. Bull N Y Acad Med 1968;44(2):117-124. PMID:
5237655.
16. Delone WH, McLean ER. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manag Inf Syst 2003;19(4):9-30.
17. King WR, Rodriguez JI. Evaluating management information systems. MIS Q 1978;2(3):43-51.
18. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 1989;13(3):319-340.
19. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 2003;27(3):425-478.
20. Shaw NT. 'CHEATS': a generic information communication technology (ICT) evaluation framework. Comput Biol Med 2002;32(3):209-220. PMID:
11922936.
21. Mammen A, Weeks R. Electronic Medical Record (EMR) technology acceptance by healthcare professionals in South Africa Proceedings of 2014 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology (PICMET); 2014 Jul 27-31. Kanazawa, Japan; p. 3539-3548.
22. Ohinmaa A, Reponen J. A model for the assessment of telemedicine and a plan for testing of the model within five specialities. Helsinki: Finnish Office for Health Care Technology Assessment; 1997.
23. Bashshur R, Shannon G, Krupinski E, Grigsby J. The taxonomy of telemedicine. Telemed J E Health 2011;17(6):484-494. PMID:
21718114.
24. Dattakumar A. A unified approach for the evaluation of telehealth implementations in Australia. Melbourne, Australia: Institute for a Broadband-Enabled Society; 2013.
25. Van Dyk L. The development of a telemedicine service maturity model [dissertation]. Stellenbosch, South Africa: Stellenbosch University; 2013.
26. Nepal S, Li J, Jang-Jaccard J, Alem L. A framework for telehealth program evaluation. Telemed J E Health 2014;20(4):393-404. PMID:
24621384.
27. Bergmo TS. Can economic evaluation in telemedicine be trusted? A systematic review of the literature. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2009;7:18PMID:
19852828.
28. Hersh WR, Hickam DH, Severance SM, Dana TL, Krages KP, Helfand M. Telemedicine for the medicare population: update. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2006;(131):1-41. PMID:
17900201.
29. Zanni GR. Telemedicine: sorting out the benefits and obstacles. Consult Pharm 2011;26(11):810-812. 814821-824. PMID:
22079791.
30. Goldberg LR. Assessing quality of telehealth: home heart failure care comparing patient-driven technology models Proceedings of Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) 2007 Annual Conference; 2007 Sep 26-28. Bethesda, MD.
31. Grain H, Schaper LK. Health informatics: digital health service delivery: the future is now!. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2013.
32. Cruz-Cunha MM. Handbook of research on developments in e-health and telemedicine: technological and social perspectives. Hershey (PA): IGI Global; 2010.
33. Tanriverdi H, Iacono CS. Knowledge barriers to diffusion of telemedicine Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems; 1998 Aug 14-16. Helsinki, Finland; p. 39-50.
34. Whitten PS, Allen A. Analysis of telemedicine from an organizational perspective. Telemed J 1995;1(3):203-213. PMID:
10165157.
35. Adler-Milstein J, Kvedar J, Bates DW. Telehealth among US hospitals: several factors, including state reimbursement and licensure policies, influence adoption. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014;33(2):207-215. PMID:
24493762.
37. Tague NR. The quality toolbox. 2nd ed. Milwaukee (WI): American Society for Quality; 2005. p. 247-249.